Hi guys,
Below is an essay question that is common to get in IELTS writing task 2 Academic & GT tests. This is your chance to post your introduction and compare it to others. Writing the introduction is the easiest part so use this lesson to practise.
Essay Question: The government should allocate more funding to teaching sciences than to other subjects so that the country can develop. Do you agree or disagree?
Answer
The answers to this lesson are now available.
CLICK HERE: MODEL ANSWER & TIPS FOR INTRODUCTIONS
Remember: you need to have a background statement and a clear thesis statement. Always aim for clarity rather than aiming to impress. Avoid errors and keep your meaning clear. Keep it under 60 words.
All the best
Liz
……………………….
Subscribe to get New Lessons by Email
It is ofently believed that for the growth of the country, the government authorities should provide large number of funds to teaching science instead of funding support to other subjects. In my opinion, supporting and allocating more funds to teaching science subject is highly important however, the funds required for teaching other subjects cannot be overlooked because the other subjects are also considered helpful in reshaping the growth of child and the country.
It is a general believe that science is the only subject that can be helpful for the development of a country, therefore the government should assign more money for science education rather than other subjects. In my opinion, there should be a balanced approach in the funding, just not for science but also for other subjects and areas of career development and profession. I don’t agree with this statement completely.
Science has been changed the world drastically since recent past. Knowledge of the science will give ability to think and apply in day to day life to improve their life. Therefore I believe a government of a country should more focus on science education than other subjects and invest more money on that.
The allocation of monetary resources towards science education should be of higher priority than to other fields of learning. I am agreeable to this sentiment in view of current advancement trends that are more inclined to scientific research.
Science in itself, requires more than enough funding in order to be up to date with technology and other scientific advancement. Hence, the need for the government to prioritise this subject over other subject in terms of allocation of funds can indeed not be over emphasised or termed as unnecessary by any government that craves for the growth or development of its county.
The government should invest more in the teaching of science over other relatively important subjects to propel the development of the country. I agree to this analogy because, science has been the bedrock of development in very important aspects of our life.
It is often argued that the state should fund the education of sciences than other disciplines in order to develop the nation. I do not support this due to the fact that other courses is also as important as science subjects in the sense that development can come from arts and culture.
The government education system must reserve a various portion to science subjects, rather than different technical subjects. So, that entire nation can make a several development. I completely, agree with this statement, because it is essential part of paramedical field. However, I also believe that this science knowledge also beneficial for engineering students as well.
Some are of the opinion that more funding for taught science subjects over other subjects by government will lead to more development. However, this might not totally be true as variety spices up life and in this case, equal funding for all taught subjects will lead to a general growth. So I disagree.
Thank you Liz,
Hopefully you will recover soon.
I recently appeared in test. I scored overall 8. Your tips on writing enabled me to achieve a band score of 7.5 in the writing.
You have been a great help for me.
🙏
Prakash Tiwari
Australia
Yay!! That’s really good news! Well done 🙂
Congratulations Prakash, I am from Sydney, also preparing for IELTS academics. Can you guide me as to what all resources you refered for preparing IELTS apart from Liz’s website.
No doubt she is fantastic….
Regards
Shivangi
The role which science play in the development and civilization of a country cannot be over emphasized.Therefore , I strongly agree for a country to develop in terms of technology know-how and otherwise, the government should invest more in the teaching of sciences and also other extra curricular activities that aids in learning. However, other subjects should not be neglected.
There is no doubt that science and technology has contributed immensely towards the the development of nations across the world. Nations like China, Germany, America and Japan to mention just a few are recognized in the world today because of their advancement in science and technology. So in my own opinion, the government should allocate more funds to science and technology as it is the bedrock of the nation’s development and all other sectors of education solely reply on it to function well.
The role of science has proven to be monumental in development as evidenced by its tremenduous influence on historical inventions. In modern times too, science is the bedrock of technological and medical advancements that drive economies in most countries. Therefore I agree that governments should invest more in the teaching of sciences that other subjects.
For a country to develop, it would be useful for the government to prioritize and allocate increased funding for teaching science subjects other than others.I agree that if the government gives additional funding ,there will be innovation and technological advances hence development.
Education creates a firm foundation for a nation, however science subjects have continued to be of great impact to the development of the nations than the other subjects. I therefore agree that more funds should be allocated to the science subjects than the rest of the subjects.
Mam, could you please provide a full sample answer to this task of band 8 ..
Allocating more money for teaching sciences as compared to other subjects in order to develop a nation is what the government is supposed to do. In my opinion, I do not agree with this because a country’s growth is decided by a number of factors and every subject plays a crucial role in it.
Owing to the current rate of technological development that the world has been experiencing proves that the government has been allocating more funding to teaching sciences compared to other subjects. In my opinion it is now time to focus more on other subjects so I disagree with this statement.
I don’t believe that the growth of a Nation is relay on one particular field. Cabinet should distribute the budget equally for the mentoring of all academic subjects instead of allocating extra funds only to Science field.
Some people believe that spending more money on educating Science and technology will result in country to grow. Therefore, government should assigned more funds for it.
Although, in my opinion, all the subjects are of equal importance but in today’s world countries who allocate more budgets for science and technology lead other countries. Hence, idea of putting more money to educate science is absolute need of the hour.
In recent decades advances in science and technology takes tremendous role in the evolution and prosperity of every nation. It is undoubted that the government should expend more wealth to science related education rather than other subjects to improve particular country’s development. This essay will discuss both sides of the statement.
It is usually believed that science is more important than other subjects hence it is necessary for the government to allocate more funding to the teaching of science subjects in order for the country to develop. I do not agree with this notion. I am of the view that all subjects are important and for that matter, the resources should be spread evenly.
It is commonly held belief that a country’s government must give higher importance to teaching sciences, by granting more funds to it as compared to teaching other subjects. This is because, many people believe that a country’s development is directly related to teaching sciences. I agree with these beliefs completely.
It is often said that for a state’s economy to improve, there is the need for the government to earmark a greater amount of funds to support science education as compared to other disciplines. In my opinion, I completely agree with this budget allocation because, scientific knowledge is vital for wealth creation of nations today, in terms of medical breakthroughs and technological advances.
Teaching science in schools is very crucial to uplift the nation , therefore, some people suggest that government should provide more financial aid for science education than for other subjects.I agree to this assertion as technological and medical development totally reliant on science.
It is believed that science makes a country grow better and as such government should distribute more money in teaching science subject, in my opinions I strongly disagree as science is not the only subject needed for a nation’s growth.
Ms.Liz
I am a new follower of your website.it’s very informative.
Your efforts to help us is highly appreciated
Thank you .
God bless you.
It is sometime’s believed that government funding to teaching sciences ought to be more than other subject’s,so as to develop the country.In my opinion,science is not the only subject to develop the country hence, i disagree.Both sides of the argument will be discussed in this essay.
It is believed that science should be given more priority by the government to make the country develop by providing more funds than other subjects . It is true saying that Innovation and development go hand in hand with each other therefore this essay will truly support that government should focus on science for the country to grow.
Some people believe that more funds should be set aside to facilitate science lessons as this leads to a countrys growth while others believe that all subjects should get equal facilitation. It is true to say that science is a focal point in a countys economy especially due to the modern use of different technology however I am strongly of the opinion that science should not recieve more than other subjects as they are all important especially since people are different each with unique interests and hence contributing differently to the economy.
It is advocated by some that if the government were to expend more resources to teach science subjects than others, then the nation would progress. While the sciences are definitely necessary, it is my opinion that an unbalanced focus on them can end up being detrimental in the long run.
Education is key to a better tomorrow of every society, either developing on the developed countries of this world. The sector of education that produces different professionals like Engineers of different kinds, Doctors, Astronauts, Geologists and all other world-shaping personnel is science education. I agree that the government should increase the share of science education financing than all other subjects for the betterment of the country.
Education remains the fulcrum of any successful society. It is the obligatory responsibility of the existing authority to ensure that its educational institutions are adequately funded. Although some feel that a larger portion of the school finances should be pumped into science courses, I stand to differ with such disposition. My stance on this would be thoroughly articulated with detailed explanation in the subsequent paragraphs.
Ministry should disturbing greater money sponsor for science education than to other subjects so that Nation can be developing. I strongly disagree for this statement and think that development is not only depend on one subject,which required also other subject so equal spending money is necessary for all subjects.
Although, some other subjects play a vital role for the advancement of a country despite this many people believe that the contribution of science is much more greater for the development of a country hence government should allot more money to science related education. I strongly agree with this statement as science has an enormous output for the prosperity of a country in seceral aspects.
Investing bigger portion of funding to teaching sciences rather than to other diciplines by government will help country’ growth. In my opinion, I agree that development of teaching field of study will bring positive influence to population and will promote country development. Teaching sciences growth will open new opportunities to people, who are involved into teaching sphere, for example school teachers, as well as people, from youths to adults, with whom this newly obtained knowledges will be shared.
Why you never seen again on YouTube ? I just found your channel and website couple weeks ago. Both of them help me lots . Well I still have some problems for grammar. But I promise to keep studying and preparing for IELTS real test. Thanks Liz. You are a great teacher
Unfortunately, I got sick after making my videos and my health has not recovered enough yet to make more. Hopefully next year will be better for me 🙂
Oh so sorry, the most important is your health, thank you for help us with our english facing up the IELTS. The next year we will wait for your classes. Merry Cristhmas.
It is believed that science is the essential subject for humans growth and government ought to spend more money on science subject rather other subjects expedite the country growth. I am completely agreeing to this statement because today human life completely driven by technology and education science will empower our lives.
i strongly disagree with the idea that science subjects are more important than other subjects for human development. Despite of the advancement of science and technology, the life of humans are not more happier and safer than it was before all these science and technology development. People are suffering from anxiety, depression, poverty, isolation and loneliness more than ever. science and technology made the human life more complicated and more isolated. we need more grounding and more emotions to bring the civilization to the next level which is developed in culturally spiritually and in every other aspect to make the planet a more healthy and happy place to live.
It is an indisputable fact that nowhere has technology developed astronomically than in this generation. As a result of this, many countries have put science in their priority list when it comes to budgeting. In my opinion, it is only prudent that the government should prioritize science in the national budget given the fact that technology has wrought many advantages and conveniences in our daily lives.
Education is a very vital instrument in development of any country and any country that desire to have a better future must invest in education be it science or art. In my opinion, I believe government should allocate equal fund to both science and art.
Education is a very vital instrument in development of any country, and any country that desire to to have a better future must invest in education be it science or art. In my opinion, I believe government should invest equally in both science and art
When it comes to advancement of an economy, the political bodies should furnish adequate financial resources in the discipline of science rather than on other branches of education. In my perspective, science plays an indispensable role in the enhancement of a nation. This essay will exhibit views in support of the aforementioned statement.
It is generally believed that a county’s growth and development is largely dependent on their science and technological know-how, as a result, many are of the opinion that governments should grant more funds for science to be taught than other courses. Although there are many other subjects like finance, agriculture and arts that contribute immensely to the overall development of a nation , I believe that greater funds be allotted to teaching sciences .
In this modern technological era, it is supposed to be given more attention to grant fund for teaching science subjects in school and college level,which is being considered as this process will improve our younger generation’s skills and gradually any country can develop.I strongly support this perspective and following statements will prove my opinion.
For betterment of a country,government must increase donation to course like science than other courses to teach. In my opinion, I strongly believe that, as science can bring drastic improvement in a country, so it is extremely important for government to invest more money for it.
It’s often suggested that the government ought to devote more fund to teaching technology and science than other subjects to be able to make country prosperous However, as I explained below in sequence social science, arts are also important subjects that make contribution to the country’s prosperity as well as science and technology.
Owing to numerous advancement and development brought by scientist around the world, allocating substantial government expenditures on science subjects over teaching non-sciences becomes necessary as a result of witnessed rapid growth and much conveniences derived from science based teaching so far.
Owing to numerous rapid advancements and development offered by scientists in countries around the world,allocation of substantial government expenditures on science subjects over teaching non-sciences becomes necessary as a result of much progress and convenience derived from science based teaching so far.
One of the most important developmental aspects of a country is the provision of the budget in diverse scientific domains. It is almost commonly believed that the sciences based on teaching concepts ought to be financed by the government more than the others. I firmly disagree with this assertion and the rational reasons for this opposition will be scrutinized in this essay.
It is thought that allocating more money by the government to teach other subjects compared to science and science related subjects promote the development of the country. I disagree with this statement, in my opinion , I believe that sciences plays a major role in agriculture, research , medicine and many other fields , investing fund in this subjects will definitely leads the country to develop.
The government should make more financial provision or reserve in their annual budget for sciences education.Although, all the subjects have vital role in the life of any students but science always has very higher rank all of them . Furthermore, all the science’s students have to study on all the topics and later they have to do their own experiment in the labs which require more money.In fact, all the student are unable to bear these extra cost.
A country’s development depends on the growth of technology and innovative research in the field of science. In order to achieve this, the government should disperse more funds in teaching core subjects like science rather than arts. I partially disagree with this opinion, as I believe that along with sciences, the arts subjects also play a vital role to make a well developed nation.
Development is a priority in many countries and as such, many government are focusing on strategies that can make it a success. For some, science is the key, that means more funds should be channelled into science education, for others it may not be necessary.
In this contempory eppoch,studying science and other subjects are debatable.lt is considered by some that the country authorities must provide more financial support to teach science subjects to build up nation.however other subjects also valuable for the economic balance of a country. Therefore, I totally disagree with the statement
given and will explain before reaching a conclusion.
Kindly rectify the introduction.
Thanks
Priya
The development of a nation is related to how the government invests in their education sector, particularly sciences when compared to other subjects. Since teaching sciences involve implementation of expensive platforms, I agree that each countries’ authorities ought to set aside more funds for this. This would lead to the development of the economy with more innovative minds representing the nation, with new technologies, on a global platform.
The governing body is required to consider more funds to teach scientific subjects comparing with others, for the future development of the country.
In my opinion, I agree with that statement. However, I also believe that personal interest of the students also be considered for the selection of subject for future goals.
Essay qn: the government must apportion much more funds to teaching science subjects as compared to other subjects in order for the country to develop.
In my opinion, I do agree that the government must assign much more funds to teaching sciences other than other subjects in order for the country to develop. However, other subjects are equally important and they should as well be catered for. In this essay, I will discuss the significance of apportioning much more funds to teaching science subjects
It is argued nowadays that funding didecatedfor teaching science should be more than that for other subjects asscienceis substant in nation development. this essay completely disagree with this openion. I believe that although science is very important for the development of any nation ,other fields are not less important than science in building the humanity civilaization
It is believed that the government should allot more budget to science than to other subjects to help for the progression of the country. I strongly agree that providing more funds to science teaching will help in numerous areas such as performing profound researches particularly in drugs, and to further advance the technologies in this field.
Nowadays, due to advancement in science section there are more growth and better future. Therefore,it is believed by some people that government should allocate more money on science than other subjects. In my opinion, I strongly think that it good decision to allocate majority of funding in science subjects, it is also important to allocate money on other sectors like transport, agriculture and art.
Nowadays, research and development on science and technology across the globe has become inevitable to keep themselves ahead of other countries.Although, it is imperative to focus on other subjects as well. According to me, it is essential for the government to budget considerably on modern science at the same time they should also focus on other arts and history subjects.
There is a belief that the government should grant maximum funds to teach science subjects compared to other subjects so that the country could benefit from science advancements. Even though science has many innovations that have a huge impact on people’s quality of living, I feel that all other subjects should have given an equal priority as they also contribute to country growth and prosperity.
The purpose of government spending has always been a controversial issue. It is often argued that the taxpayer’s funds ought to be concentrated on science subject more than other subjects. I am at complete accord with this statement. This essay intends to elucidate arguments in favor of my stance.
Science opens our mind of creativity and discovery. Without research this is not possible to coming out with mankind blessing. In a word, science is the core of every discovery and innovation. Sometime research comes out with failure. Thinking about the risk of initial failure in scientific research investment we are stepping backward. We need to understand that patience is bitter, but its fruit is sweet. For advancement of any nation; its government should be more aware in introducing the blessings of studying science among its young generation.
Education plays a significant role in this fast progressive generation. it is believed that science and technology serve as a gateway to the advancement of ones country. However, arts also, is believed to be the stepping stone for success.
I disaccord this, as arts also has got Balanced prominence in the growth of a nation. Hence, the government should fund money for both research oriented studies and conventional subjects in a balanced way.
These days, education plays a big role to to increase nations quality. Some people believe that science is one of the most important subject to study and government should make teacher’s wage become more than other subjects. I am totally disagree about that. In this essay, I will discuss my points of view about this issue.
Teaching of science subjects is no doubt important to the development and growth of any nation. for the same it is believed that the government should give more funding towards this area.I strongly disapprove the following statement as I think with the advent of the twenty first century round the corner, other career opportunities which need expertise in other fields are also gaining equal importance.An all around development in all areas is the need of today.
More money should be giving out for the learning of science subjects in schools than to other subjects, by the government of any country, because scientist can give ideas that could result to positive changes in a country. I am of the opinion that every government at all level should take this step because science improve life and solves problem.
Science education is at the heart of a nation’s development and sustainability. It is believed that, the government of the day had better commit more resources to funding science and technology education than others. In my view, I think that, science education does not only create jobs for the people in a country but also improves the export base of the nation.
There is a contentious argument over whether the government should budget more money to sciences than to other subjects for the development of the nation. I totally agree with this notion. This is because of the more practical experiences required and also more qualified teachers.
In today’s world, many countries around the world are experiencing difficulties to explore the options to gain wealth. Many people, including myself, believe that increasing the funds that allocate to teaching science in school will definitely help such countries to achieve the above task in the long-run; however, some disagree.
There is a common believe that government needs to allocate more money on teaching sciences rather than on any other subjects in order to uplift the country’s current status. It is an irrefutable fact that science plays vital role in modern world. However like science,other subjects are equally important to teach them for a better education. So I am not agree with the above statement and my answer is elaborated below.
For a country to develop, it is often believed that more money be allocated to sciences than other course of study. While science may have a vital role in the growth of a society, in my opinion, i disagree with it being majorly funded and believe other courses also be given attention.
For a country to develop, it is often believed that more money be allocated by the government to sciences than other course of study. While science may have a vital role in the growth of a society, in my opinion, i disagree with it being majorly funded and believe other courses also be given attention.
I disagree that investing more budget on science by government rather than other disciplines will lead to growth of the country. Initially this essay will look at the consequences of having knowledge only in science and after that it will expalin how contribution of other subjects will help in development of the nation.
It is often believed that government should
allocate more funding in education specially on teaching science and therefore country’ s development. I completely agree with this statement because investment on education are the best way to improve and develop a country.
Undoubtedly, scientific study plays an instrument role in all human beings’ Life. This essay agrees that for the development of a particular country , funds should be arranged in order to provide coaching of more science subjects rather than to emphathize on other subjects.
Undoubtedly, scientific study plays an instrumental role in all human beings’ life .This essay agrees that for the development of a particular nation , funds should be arranged by government in order to provide coaching of more sciences subjects rather than to emphasize on other subjects.
Education is the concrete foundation for drastic upliftment of the nation. So, not only science, each and every field has its own contribution in order to bring about radical changes. Therefore, I believe that budgeting in all subject must be based on equity rather than equatily as the equipment and setting differs from one another. As we know, science and other technology based subject require comparatively advance area, hence appealing more of the budget.
There is a contentious argument over whether the government should budget more money to the teaching of science to other subjects in order for the nation to develop. I totally agree with this notion. This is because of more practical requirement and also science teaching needs qualified teachers.
In the modern era, Government should give more resources to teaching sciences than to other subjects, in order to develop the nation. I disagree to the above statement that government should put more focus on sciences; as the importance of other subjects like economics, business studies, languages are equally important. The nation can only be growing when equal weightage is given to all the areas of leaning in the curriculum. However, one cant deny the fact that science and technology is the backbone of country’s prosperity.
Some individuals believe that more funds are supposed to be channelled towards scientific educational purposes for a nation to develop whilst others think that every other subject at school counts.In this era of advanced technology and greater employment opportunities i do agree to a greater extent with the statements although on a negative aspect it has also scaled down number of employees replacing them with machinery.
Yes I do agree. Science is the main source of any developed country. If we consider the top ten developed countries, all they have in common is leading in Science and Technology both in knowledge and funding. But the knowledge develops with proper funding. If we consider the countries such as USA, China, Russia and Japan etc.. they are very good in scientific research and development.
Education plays indispensable role in the development of a nation. For that, more money should be set aside by the government officials for teaching subject like science instead of other courses so that nation can progress . I totally disagree with this fact and believe that authorities should distribute educational funds equally to the all subjects .
The 21st century has been associated with a large amount of attention to tertiary education. Therefore, it contributed to a new belief according which the government is expected to specify more money to sciences than other subjects in this regard. It is believed that adopting this policy will lead to the development of the nation. I entirely agree with this attitude for a number of reasons.
I strongly disagree that investing more money on science subject rather than in other disciplines will lead to the development of the country. Intially this essay will exaplin how other subjects can also contribute to the growth of the nation and after that it will look at the consequences of having knowledge only in science.
It is widely assumed that existing authorities must sanction more money towards the education of science and Technology as it helps to boost development of a nation. Vital role of science and its applications in substantial growth of a country is undeniable and therefore, considered to seek more attention. However, other subjects are significant too and their contribution can never be ignored, when it comes to the question of development. Hence, I have a partial view towards the notion and , I will state my views in
the following essay.
The discussion as to whether the state finance should be channel more into teaching science subjects than other subjects has been a topic that divides opinion. Considering the numerous benefits of science subjects, I strongly agree that it is better to channel more of government resources into teaching science subjects than other subjects.
In recent times,financial assistance by government to schools is now a norm in the country.
There is an increase in grants being given by the government in the field of sciences rather than the other courses so as to boost the economy.
In this essay I will discuss reasons why the government need to focus more in contributing to funding the teaching of sciences.
For a country’s development, the government needs to allocate considerable funds in education mostly in sciences. Although all the disciplines play a notable role in the advancement of the country, In my opinion, the government should avail more financial support in the teaching of sciences to motivate innovation and research.
Research has shown that the development of any nation is dependent on the attitude of the government to science and technology. Some people are of the opinion that financial attention should be paid to the teaching of science at all levels of education. I strongly agree that for a country to develop significantly, its government should allocate more funds to enhance effective teaching of science subjects.
The role of science has proven to be monumental in development as evidenced by its tremenduous influence on historical inventions. In modern times too, science is the bedrock of technological advancements that dtive economies in most countriea. Therefore, I strongly agree that governments should invest more in the teaching of sciences than other sciences.
Education plays an inevitable role in the development of country ,However ,i strongly believe that when science combined with other subjects would in turn boost the overall development of a nation as a whole.
The government should assign more fund to educating sciences than other courses so that the nation can be improved. In my opinion, Is disagree with this because learning other subjects like Art can also contribute immensely to the development of a country
Thanks for info!
A particular group of people have the assumption that , for a nation to develop very well the law makers have to consider budgeting huge amount of money for improving science knowledge and less on other fields that are not scientific in nature. No doubt, this approach will definitely enhance the development of the country economically , when the the scientist and technologist being prioritized in term of funds distribution.
It is often believed that government should budget more money into lecturing science courses than other courses, so as to enhance national development.Although other subjects like finance might contributes to the nations advancement, However,In my opinion, i strongly agree that science subjects should be funded with much money as science related courses plays a vital role in technological advancement of the country .
Hi Mam
I wrongly posted my answer under another person’s post.Could you please check my answer.
Even though the majority of people believe that the science education should be more encouraged than the arts and social sciences i will be with the few people who truly believe that the arts and social sciences should be more encouraged with the financial support of the government, in order to develop a country in a productive way. Most of the people who are leaving the country for better jobs in abroad are learned in science stream. But the people who are educated in arts and social sciences stream are rarely responsible for the brain drain.
Although, some other subjects play a vital role for the advancement of a country despite this many people believe that the contribution of science is much more greater for the development of a country hence government should allot more money to science related education. I strongly agree with this statement as science has an enormous output for the prosperity of a country in seceral aspects.
The twent-century technological advances have positively affected the whole population. More and more hands are needed to ensure the continuity of this development. Hence, it is highly needed that, more of government’s fund should be used for teaching science courses rather than any other courses.
It is widely assumed that authorities must sanction more money towards the education of science and Technology as it helps to boost development of a nation. Vital role of science and its applications in substantial growth of a country can never be ignored. However, other subjects are significant too and can never be taken for granted, when it comes to the question of development. Hence, I have a partial view towards the notion.
The twent-century technological advances have positively affected the whole population. More and more hands are needed to ensure the continuity of this development. Hence it is highly needed that more of government fund should be used for teaching science courses rather than any other courses.
It is believed that teaching science helps a nation to develop more and more as compared to other subjects and government should encourage the students as well as the institutions to study and allocate more funds in science
Thesedays, due to advancement of science subject, there are improvements and better future.Therefore money people believe that government should fund more to science section rather than other section of subjects.however,while I believe that it good decision to allocate funding more on science than other subjects but at the same time we should also consider on other subjects.
The importance of science cannot be overemphasized to any country. Recently, some people are of the opinion that teaching of science subjects, should get more attention from the government most especially in terms of funding. I completely agree that for a country to develop, its government should aid teaching of science financially.
For a country to develop, several and various factors which contribute positively to the country’s development are to be considered. i disagree to the idea of Government allocating more funding to teaching more sciences than other subjects in order for the country to develop. teaching other Arts subjects like Agriculture, among others will promote an all inclusive developed Country.
Hello Liz,pls help me review my introduction answer.Very important for me
Improving the country’s development progress depends on many factors. Science and technology have major role in that. Teaching and investing more on Science related education is always beneficial. So in my opinion i believe that Government should spend majority of funds on Science subjects. Yes i do believe that we should not ignore other subjects. It can be like spending like 60-70 % on science and 30% on other subjects. So that we can have some balance for other subjects. Other subjects also have some contribution in countries development.
I consider it is the best the goverment can do with funds because a country educated is a country with many chances of development. Education in science implies better managment of natural resources, technological advaces, solutions to different economical fields among others. In my country, the goverment no only have to allocate funds to education science, also to education in general due to low results in Pissa tests.
Education is the fulcrum of any successful society. It is the obligatory responsibility of the existing authority to finance its educational institutions be it sciences or arts. Some are of the mindset that more of the school funding should go into science courses. I stand to differ with this claim. My stance on this would be thoroughly articulated and presented succinctly in the subsequent paragraphs.
It is undeniable that science plays essential roles in the development of the government sector and I believe that there are other means that enhance the well being of the government growth some of which include arts , agriculture and to mention but a few. Thus, there should be a balanced approach in the funding not not only science but ‘the rest’.
Education is the fulcrum of any successful society. It is the obligatory responsibility of the existing authority to finance its educational institutions be it sciences or arts. However, some people are of the mindset that more of the school funding should go into science courses. I stand to differ with this claim. My stance on this would be thoroughly articulated and presented succinctly in the subsequent paragraphs.
Large part of the government resources should be allocated to science subjects than other subjects in other for the nation to be well equipped with technology for better productivity. I agree to a large extent that studying science subjects will enhance the students and exposes them to develop their country to be more civilised.
Education plays a vital role in the development of a nation. People are of the view that, for a country to develop , state authorities should pay more attention to science education in terms of allocating funds for teaching and learning while less considering other subjects. In this piece, I would expatiate on this development however, I agree with assertion.
Earmarking more money to lecturing sciences other than other subjects by the Government, is believed to be a way to boost the country’s productivity. Despite the fact that the contributions of sciences cannot be over emphasized, I think funds should also be apportioned to other fields as much as sciences. most importantly, it should be equally shared among all fields because each of them has something different from the other to offer.
Increasing the sciences course price than others by the government ends up with high income that ables the country to be evolved.
It is argued that countries should spend more money on science course than other courses due the many benefits it can bring to a nation . It is agreed that the government should prioritise science field when it comes to funding because teaching science will lead to higher innovation and productivity and can improve a country’s economy in long term .
Education is vital for everyone in the world and it should require compulsory financial assistance from the officials.Despite, it might cost hefty rates need to spend on various subjects’ lectures, I strongly agree that a higher composition of means should be offered to scientific and research oriented studies on contrary to conventional subjects to augment future job prospects and wealth in the country.
Although i think an increase in funding in both technical and science subjects is imperative,it is not all countries that have implemented this ideology and succeeded.However,i think excellence in these subjects is the stepping stone towards a technologically advanced country.China is such a rare example of a country reaping rewards for not only supporting sciences but making sure they start teaching them at an earlier age.
It is often argued that, in order to promote development of a country, the government should invest more money in teaching science and technology subjects as compared to other subjects. I strongly agree that government should allocate more funding to teaching sciences.
Most developed nations has invested much in science due to its positive contribution to the society and I strongly agree that Government should apportion more resources to science courses than any other program taught in school due to its importance mostly in the area of technology and health (medical professionals) which helps in the advancement of the society. Technology and health all emanates from the study of science and there are many areas it helped to develop our country
The government should spend more money on teaching science rather than other subjects so that our nation will be developed.I agree that science plays a major role in our country development,other subjects are also important to know about country financial Status as well.
Education plays a fundamental role in a country’s development and Government contribution is mandatory in it. Some people argue that to make a state developed, authorities should pay more attention to science subject rather than other by releasing more funds. However, according to my opinion, I strongly disagree with this statement because science disciplines alone cannot lead a nation on the developmental track. It must be assisted by other subjects like art and craft, management and economics.
The development of every nation depends solely on science and technology nowadays. As a result many governments believe that investing more of it’s resources in to scientific projects is more pivotal than apportioning state funds into other subjects. In my opinion, I strongly agree that channeling more money into science and technology will enhance productivity and also improve the economic wellbeing of people
Every subject contributes to the overall growth of society in its own way. However ,the impact of Pure Science cannot be ignored.It has made our life so much more easier, comfortable and fast paced. Therefore, in my opinion higher budgetary allocations in the area of Science will boost newer inventions and encourage rationale thinking which is essential in a progressive society.
Hi Mam
Can you please correct my answer.I have wrongly posted my reply under another answer.
It is claimed by few that, the government need to be provide a huge amount of resources for teaching of science as compare the other subject for the growth of nation. I strongly oppose this point of view as development is not depend upon only science it’s affect by the economically socially
More government funds should be set aside for teaching sciences as compared to other subjects to help enhance the country’s productivity and growth. In my opinion, I agree that teaching sciences should receive more money than the other units because this will have positive impacts on technology and health, besides improving the country’s development.
It is often believed that the government should destinate most of its funding to impart sciences, prioritizing it over other fields of knowledge in order to achieve the country´s development. in my opinion, this is an old fashioned way of thinking that relegates arts and humanities to a second plane, generates discrimination and gives more opportunities to certain kinds of professions, ignoring that human personalities and skills vary from each individual.
The government should raise financial funds for teaching and schooling sciences subject matter for evolution and development of country instead of other topics.This essay agrees that for better education and growth of the country is necessary to expense more over and provide money funding on theme of sciences rather than another subjects by the government.
For a country’s development, there is a need for the government to spend more money on teaching science courses than other courses. I believe that allocating more money to teach science courses is essential for the development of a country.
The development of countries must be comprehensive for all fileds.So, the focus on one subject and ignoring the others is unequal process for development.According to that I disagree with the idea of collecting more money for teaching sciences than other subjects.
It is argued that science oriented courses s opens up children sind and allow for thinking outside the box as its said these days ,in view of this ,the government should of a necessity spend more money on learning this subjects rather than in other courses as this will bring about growth and development in the country .I totally agree as this will not bring about country’s development alone but great individuals with great minds which are assets to the nation economically and scientifically are also made.
It is claimed that,compared to general subjects science related should be given more funding by govt. for the sake develop the country.Although I do not have enough faith on this policy.
Blessing says,
Every country that desires development
should think of improvement in the area
science and technology that involves
allocating more capital to it.
However, In my opinion, the funding of science shouldn’t be at the expense of other aspects of human development such as art, commence and other, because if this happens, other aspects of development will lag behind, resulting to an imbalance in individual lives and the nation at large.
In comparison to other fields, the allocation of funding for teaching sciences ought to be increased by the government, for the country to develop. In my opinion, I agree that the allowance of financing science-related subjects is exceptionally beneficial; as it helps to produce more innovative individuals and knowledgable society for the development of a country.
It has been opined that science is the only factor to lead the nation in a progressive path.Thus ,government should spend money to teach science subjects among people rather than emphasising on different subjects; however , I disaccord with this notion because language and mathematics are more valuable and can be provided to dwellers at minimal costs as compared to science.
In our community and authorities were targets to new generation to teaching sciences than to others. Subjects because it increase our countries ecnomy yes, increase these teaching method is good and benifit our country and also help individuals personal growth But , I couldnot fully supported to this statement. That is, each individuals have their own skills and ability to different level task some of them have interested to other subjects like arts ,crafts, musics ect.. so that, in my views l suggest tother subject also can develop our country and ecnomy growth .The government should allot fuding all subjects
Science is considered to be one of the many fields that aids in national development. It is argued by some that governments should give more financial assistance to science as a subject, others too however, believe that equal funds should be allocated to other subjects in school. I think that based on the era we find ourselves, more incentives should be directed to the study of science.
The State should distribute more money to the education of sciences as compared to other subjects in order for the country to progress. In my opinion, I do not agree to this budget allocation because to build a robust economy, besides having well trained scientists and engineers; there is a also a need for highly trained business professionals and specialized arts stream experts
Science is considered to be one of the many fields that aid in national development. It is argued by some that governments should give more financial assistance to science as a subject, others too however, believe that equal funds should be allocated to other subjects in school. I think that based on the era we find ourselves, more incentives should be directed to the study of science.
Some believe the Government should increase it’s budget for teaching of Sciences over other subjects to enhance the growth of the Nation.However, i agree with the position that by increase of finance in sciences will enable the hiring of qualified Teachers and equipping scientific Lab,will in turn produced greater scientist for better tomorrow while not condemning other subject completely.
Mam kindly tell can we take eatables like almonds with us in exam centre because i have heard it took so long till its end.
You can ask your test center, but it is unlikely.
No doubt that every subject should be given the same financial consideration when it comes to finding but I believe that sciences should be given a second thought. The big challenge of most science colleges or science classes is money for the appropriate chemicals and tools for research works or experimentations, and that is the reason half-baked graduates in practical sciences. Hence, I agree to an extent that sciences be given more fiscal policy.
Education is indispensable for the overall development of a nation. It is the utmost responsibility of the government to provide monetarily help to this system. Some holding this opinion only for science students is quite contradictory as all the streams are equally contributing towards the nation. Thus financial aid should be distributed equitably.
Owing to the importance of science in development of a nation, some believe that it should be funded highly compared any other subject. I believe it would be a mistake only to emphasize on one subject and equal allocation of tax money across different disciplines is crucial for a nation to proper.
Revised: Owing to the importance of science in the development of a nation, some believe that science-related courses should be funded highly compared to any other subject by the state. However, in my opinion, it would be a mistake only to emphasize education of one stream than others, and equal allocation of tax money across different disciplines is crucial for a country to proper.
The governing body have to dispense a greater portion of their education budget for intuiting science subjects rather than other streams.I strongly agree with this statement because scientifically profound youngsters would not only abet technologic advancement but even a healthy and medically sound nation.
Now a days in the modern era we can’t even think of our life without being involved in science and technology. It’s really of great significance to fix goverment budget in education based on science so that more pupil get acknowledged with the advancement of technology from the beginning of their academic life so that at the end their knowledge and wisdom can bring much more innovative advantage to their own nation.
Many countries in the world , improving science get more benefits for various way so that each country government spend much funds to related science subject than others . I strongly agree with that point because It does not mean other subjects are not necessary. There several reason why government decides to do this .
Kindly miss if you review answer tommorow it’ll helpful to those who are appearing on 7 December actually, my test is also on same day and today i had a speaking test
I’ll post the answer with tips on Thursday so that other people have a chance to post their answers tomorrow.
Appropriate allocation of funds by the government for education in a country plays a major role in the development of the nation. With the growth in Science and technology around the globe, it has become important to invest funds in the teaching of sciences than to invest in other subjects. By investing in the teaching of sciences, more technology can be developed resulting in the increase of Information and technology industries. An increase in the information and technology Industries would result in more employment opportunities and also development of the country economically.
More money should be set aside by the government for teaching science instead of other courses in order to enhance national advancement. In my opinion, while other subject fields are important, science and technology courses will improve a country’s innovative development.
It is argued that for a nation to progress, a country should invest more of the resources to teach science instead of other subjects, according to some. In my perspective, authorities should consider scientific as well other subjects for the development of students from every prospect.
Some people believe that teaching subjects that focus on science should be prioritized over other subjects for a country to progress. As a result, government should predominantly sponsor programs that teach science at schools and universities. In my opinion, I strongly agree that funding science-related education is vital as it educates people to appreciate the value of human life and contribute to the economic growth of a country.
Mam give me some tips regarding ielts because i will book my ielts exam on 14 december
There are hundreds of pages of tips and lessons on this site. Use the RED MENU BAR at the top of the site to access them.
Education remains an issue among countries.Advancement in science and technology has forced the educationalists for demanding more financial assistance to sciences ,ignoring other subjects.The aforesaid statement does not seem relevant to me.I will discuss my opinion in this essay.
*Basically studies which involves in the science is on the experimental basis .So, it take a quite longer period as compared to other stream of studies. So , the Government should allocate more fund on the science. However all the streams in the education are equal, but science has most accuracy than other streams of education. So, The government should provide allocate more funds to the department of science.
All subjects should be considered equally as every subject has important to the society. Despite the importance, science bear a bigger role to our country in that without health no development hence I agree that the government should input more funds on sciences than others.
Science is an integral part of advancement and development that any country willing to experience must pay close attention to. Many people considered that this subject should be taught the best and government should apportion the most finance to the cause. And I strongly agree with this because it will help deepen the confidence of the students and increase the effectiveness of our scientists
Some people say, the government should set aside large amount of money in educating sciences, whilst other subjects get less money for the development of the nation. To greater extent l disagree, as both subjects contribute in the development of the country. However, to lesser extent l agree, sciences brings technology to greater heights
Allocation of budget for purposes of teaching is crucial for betterment of the country. Science should be taught and maximum investments should be in priority for delivering science education. A well-educated person in science can surely lead to prosperous nation. However, investing all the funds for science alone is not a suitable option. I completely disagree about funding maximized just for science education.
Science is an integral part of advancement and development tht any country willing to experience must pay close attention to. Many people considered that this subject should be taught the best and government should apportion the most finance to the cause. And I strongly agree with this because it will help deepen the confidence of world innovators and increase the effectiveness of the scientists
Appropriate allocation of funds plays a central role in the balanced development of country.Higher fund allocation to education of science is the issue under consideration. Ihe following essay emphasized on a balanced allocation of funds to all subjects and presents viewpoints in support
Science plays a vital role in the development of a country and government needs to increase allocation of funds to this discipline. I strongly agree to this because science is the hem of the technology we enjoy
It is consider by sme people that government should spend much more money on teaching science and less on the other subjects in order to the country to prosper .In my opinion, allocating more money to science will limit the development of other fields, which might have a negative impact on both society and individuals
The growth of the Country is dependent on some factors like sciences and other disciplines. Although there are other fields that need government funding, sciences ought to have more financial delegations
that other subjects. I consider this true because because how far a Nation will go to an extent depends on how effective the science background is
It is often believed that nations ought to spend of their finance in teaching more of science subject rather than other subject, I quietly agree to this in the sense that science subject is the bedrock of most valuable, professions that can enhance the economic, infrastructure and technological status of a nation, such subjects which could either be social science or pure science.
Although science has a great impact on the development of a country hence funds has to be created for that,I think other subjects are equally important to help in the development of a country. Other subjects for instance environmental studies studied in Ghana educates the individual on the environmental hazards and the need to keep the environment clean,hence helping in the development of a country. I totally disagree to the topic based on the above words
Most people argue that the sciences are of higher importance than other subjects when it comes to national development. As much as these people might have valid reasons for such a stand, I completely disagree with them. This is because giving more financial support to such courses does not necessarily mean the country will develop. I believe more help is needed in teaching basic skills than science and children might get very little of other subjects which could lead to better national growth than the sciences.
Science education is grown rapidly around the world corresponding to the new discoveries and inventions, Although teaching all subjects equally is believed to be common among many countries, sciences educations is considered to be superior by most educational institutions. Thus, a higher funding should be allocated on teaching sciences compared to other subjects. I substantially disagree with this point of view.
It’s very necessary for the government to invest more found in teaching sciences then any other budget because this will help the country to develop progressively which will now help to reduce corruption in the country.i agree that the more the government invest in teaching sciences,the better the country will be.
Distributing more money by the government for science courses would lead to the growth of the country than other subjects. However, I think that giving out funds for teaching other courses other than sciences will contribute to the development of the country.
Science related courses should be supported more financially by the government than the other courses as this will lead to the development of the nation. In my opinion,I totally believe that more funds should be invested into scientific areas than the other fields.
It is often argued that more funds ought to be allocated to emphasize on the study of science rather than other disciplines to help develop the country. I agree with this statement because this may likely to result in large number of students undertaking science studies and economic benefits to a nation
Some people argue that the government should be allocating extensive amount to teach science subjects compared to other subjects which can aid in development of the country. In my opinion, I agree that science has enormously changed the way we live our life today and is much more important, however I also believe that the other subjects has, as well contributed for the betterment of our country. This essay will first demonstrate on how science has made a marked effect on the country’s growth and the lifestyle of the citizens followed with the impact of other subjects on the nation.
Education plays a vital role in human life and society as a whole. While other believed that the government ought to support more financially in teaching sciences that other subjects for the development of the country,I,however do not agree with this argument.
There is an argument about whether the government should invest more money to teaching sciences than to other subjects so that the nation can develop. From my perspective, although all subjects are important and contribute to the development of the nation I strongly agree that the government should spend more money to teaching sciences than to other subjects.
It is commonly argued in developed and developing nations that more financial resources should be utilized in scientific areas as compared to other subjects.Iam completely agree with this view that be explained in the subsequent paragraphs.
It is often believed that the authorities should spend more on financing training in science compare to other field of study, in order to bring about mega growth in the nation’s economy.
I completely disagree with this, because this may lead to over dependency on a sector, as well as unhealthy competition springing up.
More money should be set aside by the government for teaching science instead of other courses in order to enhance national advancement. In my opinion, while other subject fields are important, science and technology courses will improve a country’s innovative development.
Some people believe that science subject ought to get major proportion of the state education funding, for the country to progress.In my opinion, I strongly agree that science should get more money from the government than other subjects as it benefits the society most by giving latest technology and well skilled professionals like doctors, which are vital for the development of any nation.
This days it is imperative that the government increases it funding towards the teaching of science courses rather than other field of studies, in other to develop the country. However, it is said that other field of studies can be very important for the general growth of the country. This essay will argue why more resources should not be allocated only to science subjects but shared equally among all subjects.
In this era of technology and science, priorities in the educational area should also follow and answer the new generation’s needs accordingly. Although other subjects such as art, music, geography and history etc are still essential for society’s development, I believe , science is the most important one so that government should prefer giving more funding to it.
It is often believed that science curses ought to be placed on higher funding priority rather than other courses for the development of the nation. In my opinion, i believe supporting science course with higher grants will be of greater development to the individual and country as a whole.
Government ought to budget significant proportion of its revenue for science teachings than to other subjects like arts or commercial for a nation to develop. In my opinion, I believe that allocating more fund to teach science will raise the number of science graduates and these countries will lead in field of science and technology.
It is often believed that science courses ought to be placed on higher funding priority rather than other courses. In my opinion, i believe spending more money on science subjects will be of greater value both to the individual and society as a whole.
A number of people are of the belief that government expenditure should cater to the education of various science faculties rather than others, for the development of the country.In my opinion,I firmly believe that this a view that the governing body of the respective country should widely encourage, in order for the positive changes.
In order for a country to develop,the government should invest more in the teaching of science subjects,and I disagree with the this statement,as there are other subjects that can also contribute positively in the development of a Nation.
In recent time, government is improving educational sector through funding in other to improve the development of the country. However, there has been a dispute about where government should allocate more funding. Some people believe it should be more into the teaching of science subject, while other think it should be into other subject like art. I strongly agree that government should allocate more funding into teaching of science subject than other subject.
The authorities should utilize more funds to teaching sciences rather than to invest on other subjects in order to take the country towards development. In my opinion, it is true that science education is the utmost demand of the modern age but few other subjects require crucial attention too for the development of the country.
The past five decades has witnessed advancement of technological welfare by most nations. It is argued that governments should channel most of its resources towards scientific subjects than to other subjects. This essay will discuss why I strongly agree with this notion.
Some people argued that for a nation to grow, government ought to allocate or release more money for science education compare to other subjects such as arts, history etc. This essay totally agrees with this statement because no nation can develop without science and also most brilliant students that will do research will end up in sciences.
For the development of country, government should distrbute more money on science courses rather than arts and business subjects. I agree with this statement, since these subjects have a vital role in this contemporary era as well mostly teenager’s have more concern in medical, engineering and other programs which are related to the science program
It is sometime argue that more funds should be spent on Science projects as compared to other fields from Government funding for better growth of that place. I disagree with this statement as every job has its own benefits.
It is believed that for the development of a country, government should increase the grant for science education instead of investing money on other subjects. I agree that most of the students prefer to study science subjects as it’s the era of development and technology. But there are many people who have interest in arts subjects and love to get educated in them.
Scientific research plays a key role in paving the way for development of a country.However, some people might argue not only the science but also many other subjects ,aesthetic subjects,for instance hold eaqul importance towards the improvement ofa nation.In my point of view ,I believe facilitating more to teach science than other subjects is benificial in many ways.
Nation can improve and progress fast, if concerned authorities spend more of budget to teach science subject rather than others.
No doubt that country progresses mainly by strong and organized curriculum materials. Over all, all subjects are imprtant and can lead to development in particular points. However sciences do lead to massive one.
It is argued by many that government should spend majority of their budgets in allocating technical sceince whereas others believe some of the public school and hospitals are more important. I agree with the former view than later view.
Do government have the role of financing science related courses? A lot of people believed that for a country to be well developed, it requires having more science oriented personnel than other field of courses.Thus, government should invest more on science related courses. These essay will argue why government should finance educational system in general and not be limited to field of science only
Teaching sciences this days has a greater value,so,higher amount of money should be devoted to teaching sciences by the government. I agreed with the statement and will discuss my reason for that.
In the present modern and technological era, there is a need to prioritize certain areas, basic and applied sciences, than the other social subjects. In my point of view, I agree that government should invest more in these science subjects for the betterment of our country.
Many believe that the prosperity of a country depends on a major allotment of funding to teaching sciences.In my opinion,focus should be towards an array of subjects,from arts to commerce.Therefore,I diagree with an education system that is concentrated on just the science subjects.
Hi Liz,
This is my introduction for the task above.
It is true that science has become the key to the development of many countries in the world. While it sounds sensible for governments to spend more money on science education than other fields of study, I personally disagree with this idea.
Regards.
To have a developed country, government should spend more funds to teaching sciences than to other subjects. Based on experience which I have as an engineer, I absolutely agree that science could be the most important part of the development in a society or a country.
46 Words.
A developed country gains its reputation primarily due to what it invests in its future. By dedicating a major fraction of finances to educate sciences, governments can not only promise a better future for its progeny, but also the prosperity and progression of the country. While other subjects also contributes to disparate sectors of the country, sciences play a key role in improving its economy whether its Medicine, computers or astronomy.
Science and technology has brought various advantages for the today’s generation. It is argued that government make more attention on such subject for teaching rather than other subjects. This eassy will give why I am completely disaccord with this statement.
The authoritarian should provide increased funding to educate more about science rather than other subjects so that the nation can progress to higher heights. This essay will argue why spending more assets in science is ultimately superior for the growth of a kingdom
I believe a notion of more amount of money ought to be poured into science teaching onlyrather than other subject courses has got nothing to do with the development of any country. I will strongly disagree to this perception and elaborate my perspective on this statement.
Allocation of funds by government in the educational sector should be more for science inclined courses to enable the development of a country while minimal funds for other courses that are not science based.In my opinion ,funds should be proportionate for both science and non-science courses because both can lead to the development of a country.
It is a known fact that science and technology have completely transformed the world. It has brought marvels in every sphere of human life; has eased life, brought luxuries, made communications possible and reduced the distances. However, in order to bring more progress and development in the field, the government needs to increase funding for science subjects.
More expenditure should be spent on lectures pertaining to science courses as compared to other academic courses in order to contribute to the development of the nation. I disagree with this because other courses such as philosophy or art have a role they partake in ensuring the economic improvement of the country.
Hi Liz,
Have a query here, for Listening , if there are two answers for a single Question , eg: Two cities :…….. and …………, how should my answer’s be , can i use comma b/w two words or just write two words .This may be a silly query but am a lil worried , please help
An upgraded government financing of imparting science education can augment better development opportunities for a country
It is believed that a nation can progress if authorities will allot more money to science subjects than any other subjects.In my opinion, I completely disagree with this viewpoint.
Yes I completely agree with the statement.the government should provide more funds to develop the nation. That is because the modern era science and technology has given huge impact of nation economy such as technology exports and research of science should enhance sophisticated methods. Most of the countries will provide specially for science
There is not doubt that education is pivotal part of countries development. However, while some believe that authorities must direct more funds to wards educating science subjects such as Sciene and Technology, Mathematics, and Physics, I along with others disagree with this statement and feel that there should be equal funding towards all the subject, as all are equally important .
The state should prepare more financing to learn sciences than to other courses so that the nation can improve , this essay statement I agree. because to increase in modern education and people to become skillful.
In this technologically advanced world, the role of science is inevitable. Some people are of the opinion that the government should provide an allowance for science teaching while the opposers argue that the other subjects also need the same attention from the government. I strongly believe that government funding for science subjects can bring a lot of benefits to the technological and commercial growth of a country.
government funds must be granted for science to educate people for the growth of the nation instead of use it in different subjects. This essay agrees with the given notion and discuss the viewpoints in the forthcoming paragraphs alongwith suitable examples.
Some people believe that the authorities need to spend relatively more money on education of science subjects as they pave the way for the progress of the community. I do not agree with this idea as education of all subjects play a vital role in the betterment of the society so the financial policy makers must remain unbiased in this regard.
It is argued by some people that science courses should be given more focus than any other subject. I agree with this school of thought as science professions contribute more to the economy than other profession.
Few people feels that in order to develop the country, government funding towards teaching science should be more than other subjects . In my opinion there should be a balanced funding structure towards teaching all subjects.
Science course is an integral part in educational institution. Hence, if properly budgeted will result to growth of the economy. I completely agree with this view as my ideas will be discussed in the subsequent paragraphs.
There is a view that science subjects are vital for children to enhance their skills and it is the sole responsibility of a government to provide more funding to such subjects. In my opinion, apart from STEM subjects, the government of any country should also focus on other subjects like arts because a better nation not only requires doctors and engineers but also artists who can contribute to the betterment of the country.
For a nation to advance, the Ministry must allot a dedicated budget for coaching science subjects than any other subjects. This essay completely agrees with this statement as practical
labs and smart class rooms are mandatory in all schools so that the students can learn ideas and concepts more effectively and sufficient funds are required to set up these facilities in each school. Those students can make a remarkable contribution towards the development of the nation.
In order for the country to develop, the government should assign more money to teach science courses. In my opinion,I disagree because it will affect other fields negatively leading to discrimination amongst students and teachers.
It is needless to say, how science play a very major role in countries development. The development of countries is measured by how much people are interested in science and information technology. All developed countries are giving a great interest to science field therefor they are achieving great industries. In my opinion government should allocate a big share of money to science subject.
For the development of the nation, the government should fund teaching science more than anyother sector.
There is an opinion that says science subjects should be prioritised over other fields of study , when it comes to alloting money for teaching, as they help a nation to prosper.
The advancement of a nation is dependent upon the government assigning more money to the teaching of sciences rather that the teaching of other courses. I quite disagree with this assertion as in my opinion, the success of every nation relies on the growth of all spheres of the economy for example the arts, agriculture and not just the science related aspects.
It is said that the authorities should put in more resources for science courses in order to enhance the advancement of a nation. This essay will discuss the extent of which I support the statement.
Country can be developed when money is being assigned to teach science subjects compared to any other subjects by the government. In my opinion, I agree that authorities can provide adequate resources and finances to educate science subjects in order to the development of country.
Some people think that in order to make nation become prosperous, the government should pay more attention and offer more financial support to teaching science than to other subjects, such as geography, math, art etc. In my opinion, teaching science is key to develop our country, additionally, teaching technology is also a very important factor.
Many people advocate drifting Of funds towards Science teaching. I strongly disagree with this as it shows a discriminatory attitude within education itself which is a tool for eliminating the idea of differences among the society. Also, no nation can grow if people with their unique interests are driven towards sciences only. Infact it may lead to frustrations and ultimately the death of the soul of nation which i believe is in history, in arts , in dance , in culture and so many factors embedded in other subjects.
The science is very important for the state to get better and the guverment should invest more in it for sure,but there are another subjects for investing too ,wich are important for developing the country as well.
Funding of education by the government has become very popular this days. It has been speculated that more fund should be budgeted for the study of science subjects compared with other subjects. In this essay, I will be agreeing to the benefit of allocating more finances to research works to aid the development of a country
Learning science is essential for the advancement of every nation. While other people suggest that a huge part of government budget should spend on teaching science, I don’t agree with this statement as other subjects are also playing an important role for the improvement of a country. Some reason why teaching other subjects should be funded as well will be discuss on this essay.
To improve the nation, the government should spend more money on educating science subjects than others. I disagree with this statement because other subjects like math, economic, IT and arts subjects also have their importance in nations advancement and the students career choices are wide and varied.
Some people think that government ought to spend more money to the study of sciences than other courses for the development of the country. In my opinion, I believe that government should give more allocations for training in science subjects because it will improve human skills and provide facilities necessary for national development .
Many argue that for a developed nation, the authority should dedicate the majority of their funding for science education compared to any other stream. This essay agrees with this statement because for the development of a nation we need a healthy population as well as better infrastructure facilities, both of which can be achieved through science.
For the development of the country, it is better forthe government to allot more fund in teaching sciences when compared to other subjects.
education one of important thing for the human by knowledge people can evolve the society that mean when government spend found on the field of teaching it will get more beneficial and all fields
Essay Question: The government should allocate more funding to teaching sciences than to other subjects so that the country can develop. Do you agree or disagree?
There should be more funds allocate by the government for science subjects to be taught for the development of the country. I do agree with educating science is paramount in every field of advancement and innovation,so there should be more money spend on sciences.This essay will discuss both views about agree and disagree of more budget reserved for science as compared to other subjects.
The allocation of funds is to be far more for science subjects than others by the state to ensure its development. I strongly support this idea of the budget distribution of any country because it will help that nation to produce advanced products in all fields of life, and also to work out modern techniques to cope with poverty.
In the world we live today, sciences have come to be the way forward for a better economy and national development.Any government that cares about her national development should allocate more fund to teaching of sciences than to other subject in my own view.
It is believed by some that government ought to give more allocation to the study of sciences more than other courses for the development of the country. In my opinion, I agree that government should spend more money on sciences because it will improve human skills and provide facilities necessary for national development .
It is a common belief that the authorities must provide more financial support for science than any other subject for the national development. Even though, I agree to this statement, one should not forget the importance of learning economics and statistics in the proper economical growth of the country.
Some believe more fund should be allocated to teaching sciences by state than other subjects, so that the economy can foster. In my opinion, i agree with this assertion, teaching sciences deserve more funding because life itself is scientific in nature and for us to understand life we have to understand sciences.
The main responsibility of each government is to provide better services for its people, which it has to provide science education sector with more funding rather than other sectors in order to assist the country for greater advancement. In my opinion, I agree that governments has to aid science and education institutes or universities with more funding in order to improve the country. But is it only the educating science that government should be worried about?
Science and technology is inseparable part of today’s rapid growing world.Considering this, I am personally in the favour that Government should invest more to educate sciences rather than other subjects to be in the race of developing nations, because of practical usage of science and and for secure futuristic approach.
These days with almost all countries transferring towards knowledge economy, governments worldwide tend to designate more money to science related subjects than that allocated to other subjects such as PE and literature believing this would accelerate their development plans. This tendency has sparked poignant controversy amongst people and even within the educational sector, while some support the government’s recent attitudes and policies, many others oppose them. I strongly see no subject is of more importantance than the other and consequently believe each needs fair attention in terms of funds being allocated to teaching them, so I disapprove paying more financial attention to science subjects at the expense of others. This argument and stance has several reasons which will be presented versus the arguments of the yes side.
Evidence has shown that Science open doors to a lots of development in the world and for this reason I am of the opinion that government should provide more resources in building capacity of students in Institution of learning more than they provide for other subjects and this in turn will boost the economy.
It is believed by some that government ought to give more allocation to the study of sciences more than other courses for the development of the country. In my opinion, I agree that government should spend more money on sciences it has a greater impact on national development.
There is no doubt that funding of education by the government and other agencies is the only way to developing young minds, thus, bringing about advancement in the economy and educational system of any nation. The world today rely more on technological advancement than in other sectors. In as much as other courses are important in educational system, I think the government should invest more in science courses than in others.
The state authority should put more resources aside to support the teaching of science subjects which could contribute immensely to the development of the nation. This essay will agree to the notion that says more funding should allocate to the teaching of science subjects than others, which will help in boosting the country’s economy.
Education indisputably plays a pivotal role towards nation building. It is, however, argued by some that governments should dedicate more funds towards imparting scientific education instead of other subjects, to further the development of a nation. Contrariwise, in my view, I am rather convinced that all disciplines are of equal importance; and therefore, it must be uniformly addressed budget-wise.
In many countries, It is evident that advancement in science and technology have put a brick in their development and reinforce their huge chunk of wealth on schools and colleges to put more emphasis on science. I partially agree that spending on science can produce better results for the development of nation because the contribution of other subjects such as economics cannot be denied. In this essay importance of science studies as well as other subjects in terms of nation to become successful will be discussed.
Due to increasing innovations in products and services starting from health cares, technologies down to what we eat, teaching sciences should be given more attention interms of funding than other subjects by national leader in order to develop the country. Owing to the contributions made by science in development in life, product and services, I agree with the statement.
The government needs to sanction good amount of funds to teach sciences rather than to other focus areas for development of the country. In my opinion, I agree that government plays a key role to focus on science and technology. However, I also believe that focusing on other subject areas is important.
Education plays a pivotal role to the community or to an individual.Subjects involved in our education system is very much needed to nurture us in all possible ways.I totally disagree with the fact that ,importance should be given to only one and not others.
It is thought that in order to develop the nation, higher funds ought to be distributed to teaching sciences than to other subjects. In my opinion, this would be the wrong step as the country cannot progress if its people are less educated in other subjects.
In this innovative world , where there is a need of regular upgradation and innovation, science and technology play a vital role . some believe that the major portion of education budget should be allocated to the science students so that they can do research on new product and check their feasibility and finally develop the product . however I strongly believes that for the development of the nation the all-round development is equally essential . Hence I disagree with the aforementioned subject
Pedagogy plays an imperative role in everyone’s life. However, authority should splurge funds merely on science subjects rather than others is a heated debate. I advocate the idea that every subject has its own importance and should pay attention equally and accordingly thay i will hashtag in subsequent paragraphs.
Great set of vocab. Good effort.. Cheers 👍
Some people believe that science ought to get more money from the state than other subjects for the country to develop.In my opinion,I strongly agree that larger proportion of education fundings should be given to science subject as it benefits the society most ,by giving latest technology and well skilled doctors ,which are vital to the development of any nation.
In today’s world, education has become a vital aspect of every governments agenda. Some people argue that to compete in an international environment, the governments must spend more money on fundemental subjects like science, technology, engineering, and mathematics while others suggest that, it should not be necessary, as it considered a waste of resources. In my opinion, I believe that governments must set aside extra finances in their annual budgets.
Introduction:
Apparently, science and technology plays a vital role in the overall advancement of a nation. Therefore, many a country, today, assign capital aids for promoting studies related to science subjects. Hence, this essay is in absolute agreement to the statement that the authorities must prioritize courses from science domain than others by providing adequate financial support for the progress of the state.
Hai Liz,
Could you please correct the introduction which i have written above?
Please suggest the areas of improvements.
Expecting a positive response from your end.
Thank you..
Regards,
Abhilash
Education is a human fundamental right. Country’s development purely relies on the citizen’s educational level and all areas of specialism not merely on science so I do not agree with the statement that the government should provide grants only for science as a nation needs specialist from other areas like history, maths, geography for overall development of the country and the funding needs to be spread out equally.
In today’s modern word, science as an essential part of everyday life. Around the globe, science is an invaluable courses for personal and community needs.
Government investing in teaching science is basically a major idea that should be done as soon as now. Science birth different discipline and also helps others to make work easier, faster and fact.
Every subject taught during the education phase of a person has its own value and importance in the upgradation of the person and the country too. Despite the fact that teaching sciences has more contributions towards growth and evolution of a nation, allocation of more funds to them is not recommended as per my intervention as the other subjects like technology and science too deserve equal funding by the government.
The local authorities should allot more money in science education than to other subjects in order for the nation to improve. I believe that allocating enough funds in teaching science has a vital role in the development of a country. However, I also agree that the government should also give importance to other subjects.
Science plays a major role in nation’s development. But it has been observed that funding allocated by govt to science is not adequate resulting in lesser innovations.
Some countries think that the science is an important factor for the development and progress’ other think that the development is achieved not only by implementing of science in our life but there are alot of factors help in development and progress.
In order to discuss which one of the two views is right we have to know first the meaning of science and which kind of science
We consider as an important mean for development.
It is suggested that for a nation to develop, the government needs to disburse more resources to scientific lectures than to other fields of study. I strongly agree with this point of view as developments in science directly boosts other sectors of the economy and ehances a country’s overall image, as will be discussed in this essay.
Thank you so much Liz, i,m learning a lot from you.lndeed sharing is caring. I hope to pass my test on the 14 th of December 2019. Passing of this test means a lot to me in terms of making it in life and my career progression. .
God bless you.
Good luck!
Some view that awarding funds to science education is important than other subjects as it plays a significant role in nations growth. I disagree with this view because all subjects are essential to prepare the students for future career opportunities and subsidizing entire education will help the country to prosper rather than funding one subject.
For a country to be more developed, enough money should be allocated to science teaching instead of other subjects.l completely disagree with this opinion because, other subjects such as English language is necessary for communication as an international language, also foundation in civic education will educate people on the importance of patriotism.
Science have proven over the years to be essential in human existence hence, is very important for government to increase financial allocation to promote science courses to others.i disagree with that opinion in my essay I will be explaining why there should be a balance in courses.
The science of a country plays a major role in the progression of any country. However, I disagree with the statement that the government should contribute more financial assistance to teach science subjects in the school compared to other subjects because it might affect the Nation in a negative way.
The government must increase their funding budget to teach science subjects rather than other subjects in order to develop as a nation. In my opinion, I completely agree that this measure will not only help in the development of a country but will also improve the economic growth respectively.
In order for the nation to experience more development, it is assumed that the government should dispense a lot of cash to educating people about science rather than other subjects, in my opinion I do agree that more money be invested in the sciences as the world is mostly ruled by science as it results to technology.
Please score me
The ruling parties ought to provide more funds for science stream rather than other subjects in order to develop the nation. I completely disagree as non-technical couseworks help in boosting the economy of the country, and at the same time it also aid in conducting developmental surveys.
More money should be assigned in teaching sciences as compared to other subjects for the betterment and development of the country. I almost agree with the above statement. I feel that to some extent development is synonym to technology and sciences.
I disagree with this statement because other subjects are more important as a science subject so teaching all subjects as science then our country is developed by gain equal knowledge of all subjects only read one subject is can’t develop our country
Science is a gateway to the world and provide a valuable set of skills. It play emerging role in our lives and helps a lot to explore the hidden potential. There should be more fund raising campaigns to facilitate the Science students for the development of their country as compared to other subjects. However, i do disagree almost entirely with the given statement. Although Science play key role in our lives but we also can not deny the importance of other study courses.
There is general belief that for the development of a nation authorities should provide more money to teach and increase the level of science subjects as compared to other subjects. However, I believe that for the holistic evolution of a country the regime should allocate equal amount of funds for all fields of study.
The notion given above that government should spend more resources on teaching sciences as compared to other subjects, i do not totally agree with this statement but i shall give my own opinion in this regard.
Nation’s development should start from the government finding more money to teach functional subjects rather than arts and cultures. Firstly, this essay will discuss the socio-economic benefits of learning science subjects and secondly, the uselessness of studying other subjects contributing less towards country’s economy.
İt can be impact to develop country İf teaching sciences are fund more by the government rather than other studies.
I disagree,irrespective of the subject what is most important is the specific and aiming at how best we can maximise and bring out the best as no subject is better than the other.
Every subject has it’s own contribution to the development of every country,arts,accounting,mathematics are very crucial to a countrys development.
Education system has the responsibility of overall development of a nation. It is opined that the financial aid should be alocated by authorities for the science education rather than other courses. I agree to this statement due to several factors which will be discussed in the writing that follows.
The government is considered to be responsible for the further progress and development of the country. Since science is the major field to make the new inventions, some people believe that the government should allocate more funds in that industry. In my opinion, this has more positive impacts than negatives in our society.
It’s been debatable topic Since ages weather governing athourities must fund on teaching specificified subject which is more beneficial for country to prosper in future. I think that focusing only one subject cannot help countries progress. In this I essay will discuss my disagreement with examples.
In this modern era, teaching sciences is very essential in students life. It is vital that government must allocate huge financial assistance for providing science education than any other topics and consequently it can help to develop every countries.I strongly agree with the statement because students can keep Pace with latest knowledge of technology and every countries economy can be developed.
It has been opined that science is the only factor to lead the nation in a progressive path.Thus ,government should spend money to teach science subjects among people rather than emphasising on different subjects; however , I disaccord with this notion because language and mathematics are more valuable and can be provided to dwellers at minimal costs as compared to science.
Science is one of the significant studies students pursue in order to achieve greater success in life. In order to develop any nation, the government authorities should avail more funds to science-related studies as compared with other subjects. In my opinion, despite the importance of science in today’s modern world, other subject’s role in contributing to society, as well as the country, cannot be overlooked.
Science is the only subject which enhances the hunger of innovation in the student. It raises the deep interest of some of the innovative learners. However, other academic lessons are also important for life as well growth of an individual and nation. I vote for disagreement to focus more on science subject in terms of financial support than other subjects.
For development of country more funds should be given to learning science, by the Government rather than other subjects. I believe that for development of country we need to excel in all field and not only in science.
Is this good?
Science is the art of creating new things. Advancement in science is pivotal to economic development.Therefore, I agree it is imperative for the government to allocate more funding to teaching sciences than any other subject to aid economic development.
Teaching sciences should be allocated more budget compared to other subjects, which would help in the growth of a nation. In my opinion, it is an apt decision to promote teaching sciences to overcome issues in the fields of healthcare, unemployment, poor economic conditions etc.
All that glitters is not gold and so applies to science and technology. In order for a nation to progress, it must be equally moulded. The government should provide a platform and support all departments to achieve the desired outcome. I disagree with the notion that science subjects should be supported neglecting the others. Other subjects like arts, mathematics, also have a key role in developing a nation.
Education is the most fundamental part of an individual’s life. A section of society believe that regulatory authorities should contribute more towards education of science, while others opine in a contrasting way. Both views will be discussed in the subsequent paragraphs and an opinion will be made.
Nowadays, we hear a lot about science and technology such as space exploration and information technology. However,there are many other subjects that are equally criminal and therefore, some people think that the administration should disperse amount to teach science,but according to me,each and every subject is equally vital.
To foster development, some have argued that government funding of the teaching of sciences be more. I do not agree to this submission because the teaching of the arts is equally important for balance development of the mind and also for improved human relationship in the society.
In this technology driven world, education of science plays a significant role in bright future of the nation. It’s is argued that as government should consider revenue for studying science rather than other fields. This essay completely disagree with statement and reaches at proper conclusion with suitable examples.
There is a recent debate on the appropriate channel the government should commit their funds. Some set of people believe that it is better directed towards teaching sciences than other courses to aid the growth of the nation while others think otherwise. However, in my opinion, I strongly disagree as science is not the only determinant of a society’s development.
If the country would like to develop, the government should apportion more money to teaching sciences than orher subjects. I agree with the view, because funding is a vital for scientific project, if you look well developed countries you can see that they spend too much money for science and they encourage their scientists to do new scientific experiment to enhance the scientific project.
Keeping in mind the development of a Nation, it is believed that the government should invest more finances in teaching sciences rather than any other subject. I agree that science plays an indispensable role in taking a country to new avenues, however, I also believe that other subjects such as Economics and Finance are also important.
The government should raise financial funds for teaching and schooling sciences subject matter for evolution and development of country instead of other topics.This essay agrees that for better education and growth of the country is necessary to expense more over and provide money funding on theme of sciences rather than another subjects by the government.